Experience
Allegations of Breach of Contract and Bad Faith in a Fire Loss Claim
We represented a national insurance company against claims of breach of contract and bad faith. Plaintiff alleged breach of contract and bad faith relating denial of a claim for fire loss. The Northern District of Ohio granted summary judgment to our client on the grounds that the insured made intentional misrepresentations relating to his financial condition and the loss of multiple items in the fire in the course of the insurer’s investigation. The district court concluded that the insured’s “misrepresentations were numerous and ever changing and material to [the insurer’s] investigation of this intentional fire.”
Allegations of Breach of Insurance Contract
We represented an insurance company in a suit for breach of insurance contract and bad faith arising out of insurance company’s decision not to pay benefits under an occupational accident insurance policy. The case was removed to federal court and summary judgment was granted in favor of the insurance company.
Allegations of Breach of Insurance Contract and Bad Faith
We represented an insurance company in a suit for breach of insurance contract and bad faith arising out of the client’s decision not to pay benefits under an automobile accident insurance policy. The case was removed to federal court and eventually settled at mediation.
Allegations of Breach of Insurance Contract and Bad Faith
We represented a company in a matter where the insurance company refused to defend or indemnify our client in a third-party law-suit arising out of our client’s business operations. We brought claims in federal court for breach of insurance contract and bad faith. The case was resolved prior to mediation for all possible damages awardable under the insurance contract, including attorneys’ fee, costs and interest.
Allegations of Fraud Against a Home Services Provider
We represented a residential home services provider in a dispute pending in the Montgomery County, Ohio Court of Common Pleas. The case involved allegations of fraud and alleged violations of Ohio’s Consumer Sales Practices Act. We successfully pursued an appeal to enforce the provisions of an arbitration agreement between the parties. As a result of the victory in the court of appeals, we were able to assist the client in obtaining a favorable settlement of the litigation. The Motion we prepared to Stay the Proceedings and Compel Arbitration was selected for inclusion in Ohio Forms of Pleading and Practice.
Allegations of Fraud Relating to Enrollment at a Proprietary Educational Institution
We defended an educational institution in a trial relating to an arbitration provision on the enrollment form. Four former students alleged they had been deceived into enrolling at the school through fraudulent and misleading statements regarding the transfer of credits and job opportunities. The enrollment form, which had been signed by all of the students, contained a provision that called for any dispute related to their enrollment to be handled through arbitration. The students alleged that they were unaware of the arbitration provision and filed suit. After a week-long trial, judgment was awarded to the client on all counts.
Allegations of Mail Fraud Relating to Outsourcing of Business
Our client, the chief operating officer of a corporate vendor in the railroad industry, was indicted for allegedly engaging in mail fraud by improperly outsourcing business to a company owned by his brother. We performed a significant amount of pre-trial work, and the prosecutor agreed to a pre-trial diversion, which led to all charges being dismissed with prejudice. We also successfully obtained an injunction that required the client’s former company to indemnify him from legal fees.
Allegations of Tortious Interference Against a Software Company
We represented several individual investors of a software development company in a complicated dispute with the software company. We successfully defended claims against the investors by the software company alleging, among other claims, that our clients had tortiously interfered with the company’s business. The court granted our motion to dismiss the claims asserted against our clients. We also prevailed on a related action for our clients where we enforced the clients’ security interest in software developed by the software company. As a result of prevailing in that litigation, the software company assigned all of the rights and interests in the software to our client. After our clients obtained the software, we were able to navigate the clients through a complicated international sale of the software, which produced a very beneficial result for our clients.
Alleged Violations of Fair Debt Credit Protection Act
We represented a debt purchaser when a consumer brought a class action counterclaim against the client for alleged violations of the FDCPA and Kentucky usury laws. The consumer argued that the National Bank Act did not preempt Kentucky usury laws and that the Dodd-Frank Act no longer allowed federal preemption to assignees. Summary Judgment was granted to debt buyer.
American Energy Corp. v. Charles Datkuliak, et al.
Won declaratory judgment allowing our client to mine in excess of $4 million of coal over the objection of the gas well owner/operator. Successfully argued the case on appeal to the 7th Appellate District, and the Ohio Supreme Court refused to accept jurisdiction.
The case set multiple precedents for gas/oil well interference with coal rights. Despite the efforts of multiple oil/gas associations to have this decision reversed on appeal and in the Ohio Supreme Court, our client won at each stage of the procedure.
Amway v. Procter & Gamble
We defended our client against a claim in excess of $100 million for alleged defamation and tortious interference. The case resulted in summary judgment for the defense.
Anonymous Department of Insurance v. Big Six Auditing Firm
We represented an insurance liquidator who alleged that the auditor defendant was negligent in auditing the financial statements for the insolvent insurance company and that the negligence caused damage to the company's estate. This case involved complex concepts of insurance, accounting, and auditing. The discovery process included the depositions of over 25 witnesses, including 5 expert witnesses. On the first day of trial, the defendant settled for a multi-million dollar sum. During the case, Dinsmore & Shohl prevailed on nearly every motion. Significantly, the trial court allowed Dinsmore's litigation team to pursue damages against the defendant based upon a deepening of the insolvency theory.
Anonymous Disciplinary Board v. Anonymous Client
I represented an individual in an administrative disciplinary action before the relevant State Board. The case was dismissed.
Anonymous Plaintiff v. Anonymous Client
I defended an individual against a claim for automobile liability in the amount of $150,000. The case resulted in a zero verdict.
Anonymous Plaintiff v. Community Medical Center
Dinsmore & Shohl represented a church whose control of a hospital was challenged by community residents in a class action. The case was settled.
Anonymous Plaintiff v. Insurance Company
Defended insurance company in multi-million dollar coverage action brought in state court in New Brunswick, N.J. by manufacturing company seeking to recover cleanup costs associated with environmental sites around the country. Among others, the suit included issues of choice of law, trigger of coverage, and allocation. The claims against the client were settled through mediation.
Anonymous Plaintiff v. Manufacturer of Dental Equipment
Dinsmore & Shohl represented the manufacturer of dental equipment in a claim alleging personal injuries as a result of exposure to sewer gas. The case was settled.
Anonymous Plaintiff v. Owners of Nursing Home
The Plaintff sued our client, the owner of a nursing home, for $100,000 for negligence related to a slip and fall. The claim was dismissed on summary judgment.
Anonymous Plaintiff v. Regional Restaurant Business
I represented the Defendant, a regional restaurant business, in a $75,000 claim for food liability. The case resulted in a zero verdict.
Anonymous Plaintiff v. Small Business Owner
I represented the Defendant, a small business owner, in a landlord tenant / property damage suit seeking $450,000. Plaintiff's lowest settlement demand was $150,000 made just prior to the jury being seated. Our pretrial settlement offer was $7,500. The total judgment awarded was $4,500.
Anonymous Plaintiffs / Claimants v. Insurance Company
We serve as regional counsel to an insurance carrier by providing coverage opinions and advising the carrier as to appropriate and consistent claims handling for multiple property and casualty claims, including wind, fire, vandalism, water damage, hail and similar perils. We have consistently prevailed in motions for summary judgment on issues of coverage and alleged bad faith.
Anonymous Plaintiffs v. Debt Purchaser
We serve as national coordinating counsel for Debt Purchaser in the appropriate handling of consumer debt collection and the defense of FDCPA and related litigation, including class action litigation. We manage local counsel and coordinate all aspects of litigation.
Anonymous Plaintiffs v. ESOP Plan Trustees
In this case, we represented two plan trustees of an ESOP on claims that were brought against them for breach of fiduciary duty and claims challenging the value of stock which had been sold by the plan trustees to the ESOP. The plaintiffs were seeking over $30,000,000. Our representation of our clients began after judgment had been entered against the defendants on liability, but prior to a determination of damages. The matter was settled.
Anonymous Plaintiffs v. Large National Coal Company
Our firm represented a large national coal company in its claims for breach of contract, fraud, misrepresentation and tortious interference with contract involving multiple coal contracts and assignments of contract for coal for a power company's North Carolina generating station. A settlement was ultimately reached.
Anonymous Plaintiffs v. Vacation Resort
Plaintiffs were injured while on vacation at a resort in Mexico. They sued our client, the Florida company responsible for the resort's marketing and sales. Plaintiffs claims were dismissed for lack of in personam jurisdiction.
Arbitration
I am experienced in handling such matters individually as well as the chairman of multi-member panels hearing and deciding private arbitrations involving large publicly traded land holding and operating companies to smaller privately held companies addressing disputes over coal reserves, leases, contract mining agreements, and sales agreements, with amounts at stake ranging from less than $1 million to in excess of $100 million. I am also experienced in handling other, non-coal related, commercial disputes as a former American Arbitration Association commercial panel member.
Arch Coal v. Tuco, Inc.
We were advising and assisting the client in very contentious negotiations over a price adjustment provision in a long term, high volume coal supply contract. As it began to become apparent the negotiations were unlikely to reach a mutually acceptable conclusion, we helped formulate a strategy that resulted in a complete re-negotiation of the contract, resulting in new pricing and other significant concessions by the utility. We filed suit on behalf of our client in the 6th Judicial District, Campbell County, Wyoming in anticipation of the filing of a claim by the Defendant utility in its own jurisdiction in Texas. The existence of the case in Wyoming assisted in reaching a commercial resolution to the dispute on terms favorable to the client.
Asbestos Litigation
Defended manufacturer against product liability claims, resulting in defense verdict at trial affirmed on appeal. Defended premises liability case, obtaining summary judgment affirmed by the Kentucky Supreme Court.
Asbestos Premises Litigation
Served as national coordinating counsel, for defendant premises owners in asbestos premises cases pending in state and federal courts. Our client owned and operated facilities were plaintiffs alleged they were exposed to asbestos while working on the premises. We successfully resolved numerous cases through voluntary dismissals and motion practice.
Asbestos Product Liability Litigation
Served as national coordinating counsel for defendant product manufacturers in multiple asbestos product liability cases pending in state and federal courts. The cases involved claims of alleged exposure to asbestos-containing products manufactured by our clients. We successfully resolved these cases either through voluntary dismissals or motion practice.
- Page 2 of 8