Experience
Granted class action certification and achieved settlement
Recently litigated separately filed Securities and ERISA class actions filed on behalf of employee shareholders, we were granted class action certification and achieved multi-million dollar settlement for our client. The company set an internal stock price which did not reflect the value of the stock when the Board of Directors knew the company was being positioned to be sold. When the company was sold for more than twice the stock price set by the Board, the employees who sold their stock during the pendency of the sale were not reimbursed the difference and sued to recover.
Hughes Miller, et al. v. Large Manufacturer of Electrical Power Systems, Products and Devices
Defense of client against product liability and breach of product warranty claim for burn injuries to electrician claiming product defect caused malfunction of electrical transformer during installation. Electrician suffered second and third degree burns on 60% of body. Plaintiff claimed damages well in excess of $1 million. Case settled for approximately $100k.
SK Construction v. Municipality
Obtained jury defense verdict in matter involving several million dollars in claims against the owner by the prime contractor based on claims of breach of contract and project design issues which allegedly caused delay.
Successfully defend client against product liability claim
We successfully defended our client, a mattress manufacturer, against a product defect claim. The plaintiff alleged our client sold a defective adjustable base, which caused injury. Product liability claims were dismissed on summary judgment.
Successfully defend client in USAID fund transfer
We successfully defended our client, a financial institution holding USAID grant funds. The federal government filed a multi-million dollar claim against our client and the account holder for allegedly wrongfully transferring funds received from a USAID grant to the account holder. The case resulted in our client not being liable for funds which it had transferred pursuant to a request from the account holder.
Thomas and Marker Construction v. Big Box Retailer
Plaintiff claimed complex construction contract was misleading and did not fairly advise Plaintiff of site existing conditions which increased Plaintiff's costs to build the project.