Search Publications

            
Date:
May 23, 2013
The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (“HIPAA”) requires health care providers to inform patients of the providers’ legal duties and the patients’ rights regarding protected health information (“PHI”). Providers do so in their Notice of Privacy Practices. The recent HIPAA omnibus rule promulgated by the United States Department of Health and Human Services alters and emphasizes obligations related to Notice of Privacy Practices. Along with this new rule, Medicare requirements have changed and now make physicians retain ordering documentation for at least seven years from the date of service.
May 21, 2013
It is probably fair to say most registered investment advisers, at least those below a certain size, did not pay a great deal of attention to the anti-identity theft, or “red flag” rules jointly adopted by the Federal Trade Commission and the various federal banking agencies in 2007 as required by Congress in its 2003 amendments to the Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”). And even those who did notice when the red flag rules were adopted could be forgiven for concluding those rules did not apply to them – after all, the red flag rules were aimed at “financial institutions” which “hold” certain “covered accounts” for their clients, and most RIAs diligently avoid holding any sort of custodial account in the first place. Plus, the SEC and state securities commissions had no role in enforcing the red flag rules anyway.
May 21, 2013
The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (“HIPAA”) protects all "individually identifiable health information," commonly referred to as protected health information (“PHI”), held or transmitted by a covered entity or its business associates. A “Business Associate” is any party that may be required to use, disclose or create PHI from or on behalf of a Covered Entity. Although most landlord and tenant relationships do not require business associate agreements, health care providers must ensure that their leases contain language to address the confidentiality and restricted access of all PHI.
May 20, 2013
As the end of the 2012-2013 school year comes to an end in West Virginia, with it comes the planning of high school graduation ceremonies. Over the years, the issue of prayer at graduation ceremonies has been a hot topic nationally, all because of the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment. The legal landscape on this issue is anything but clear.
May 17, 2013
MHC Kenworth ruling strengthens enforcement of arbitration provisions, but are they good for your business?

Although public policy generally favors the enforcement of arbitration agreements, Kentucky courts historically have faced unique jurisdictional limitations on their ability to enforce such agreements. Kentucky statutory law prevents state courts from enforcing arbitration agreements unless they specifically provide that the arbitration will occur in Kentucky. This limitation on Kentucky courts has presented a roadblock for companies attempting to compel the arbitration of disputes and required more specificity in drafting agreements to arbitrate.
May 16, 2013
By letter dated April 30, 2013, EPA Acting Administrator Bob Perciasepe denied a petition filed by the Sierra Club and other groups, seeking to have the agency issue a determination pursuant to section 111 of the federal Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. §7411(b), finding that air pollution emissions from coal mines “may reasonably be anticipated to endanger public health and welfare.” Had the EPA made such a finding, it would have then been obligated to issue New Source Performance Standards (“NSPS”) for the pollutants addressed in the determination, initially applicable to new or modified coal mines, and potentially applicable to existing mines after further rulemaking. 42 U.S.C. §§7411(b)(1)(B), (d).
May 15, 2013
May 13, 2013
Have you received an email from the Department of Labor recently? If not, you may. The Department has recently begun a program to identify whether employee “welfare benefit plans” (typically, group health plans) have filed a Form 5500 Annual Return/Report as required by Title I of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA). This program includes emails to thousands of plan sponsors.
May 8, 2013
On May 7, 2013 the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals vacated the controversial “mandatory posting” rule implemented by the National Labor Relations Board on August 30, 2011. National Association of Manufacturers, et al. v. NLRB, No. 12-5068 (D.C. Cir. 2013). The rule, titled the “Notification of Employee Rights under the National Labor Relations Act” would require every employer under the jurisdiction of the NLRB to post a notice informing employees of their rights to organize a union without retaliation. The rule also created an unfair labor practice to permit the NLRB to punish employers who failed to post the notice, created a presumption that those employers were possessed of an anti-union animus, and created a new statute of limitations permitting the NLRB to bring action against those employers more than six months after they committed the violation as an exception to the National Labor Relations Act’s standard limitations period contained in Section 10(b) of the statute.
May 3, 2013
Governor Kasich has proposed what could result in a refund of a full-year of premiums to Ohio employers over the next two years. Specifically, he has proposed a $1 billion rebate for the policy year beginning on July 1, 2011 and ending on June 30, 2012 for those employers who paid premiums during the period, who are in good standing with the Bureau, and who do not owe any money. Of this, $113 million would go to cash-strapped local governments.