Allegations of Wrongful Termination by Ex-Employee of Medical Device Manufacturer
When a medical device manufacturer faced allegations of wrongful termination from an ex-employee, they turned to Dinsmore. The plaintiff was an engineer who was originally hired by the client to serve as a project manager. Upon hiring the plaintiff, the terms of his employment were laid out in an employment contract, which also contained deadlines for the completion of various projects. After nearly a year of employment, it was determined that the plaintiff had not met the required deadlines, and he was terminated. The plaintiff alleged he was wrongfully terminated and filed 10 claims against the client, including alleged violation of public policy, breach of contract and age discrimination. We filed a motion for summary judgment, which was granted on nine claims. For the remaining claim of violation of a public policy, we prepared the matter for trial, including managing discovery and taking depositions. On the first day of the trial, before proceedings officially began, we negotiated a settlement favorable to our client, enabling them to avoid litigation.
Christine Skidmore v. Affordable Denture Laboratories
The plaintiff claimed she was the subject of sexual harassment and a hostile work environment created by the lewd comments, dirty jokes and sexual overtures from her supervisor; that her complaints were ignored; and that she was thereafter constructively discharged. This case was settled on favorable terms to the client.
Growing a business is challenging, even with the opportunities offered by today’s global marketplace. Expanding your product and service offerings to your customers requires a strategic vision and focused plan, as well as the resources to pull it all together.
Halma, p.l.c., is an international group of technology companies with its headquarters outside of London, England. Halma has worked with Dinsmore for nearly 25 years. In that time, Dinsmore has represented Halma through a multitude of acquisitions, both domestically and abroad, as Halma has grown to become a global leader in health and safety technology.
When the opportunity recently arose to acquire two companies to boost Halma’s Health and Analysis sector, the company again turned to Dinsmore for counsel. The acquisitions of California-based Sensorex, Inc. and Pennsylvania-based Accutome, Inc., offered myriad challenges. As the deals progressed, it appeared Halma would be able to announce the closings of both transactions to the Stock Exchange on the same day.
Our team worked to structure the asset purchase of Sensorex for $37.5 million and the stock purchase of Accutome for an initial payment of $20 million, handling everything from negotiating and drafting the documents to managing the legal due diligence for both transactions. We assisted Halma with the intellectual property, benefits and employment components of each deal and assisted with all details of closing.
On the Accutome deal, we were faced with the unique task of sequentially structuring the deal to comply with tax law related to the acquisition of Accutome’s Dutch subsidiary. Because of the tax implications of acquiring a subsidiary through one Halma affiliate, while acquiring the parent company through another affiliate, we were asked to ensure that the transaction involving the subsidiary was closed before the U.S. transaction was completed. This required that we coordinate compliance with Dutch requirements in real time, in order to complete the transaction prior to opening of the European markets.
Accutome is primarily known for designing diagnostic equipment used to identify eye conditions and for innovative surgical instruments. Sensorex, a manufacturer of electrochemical water sensors, will enable Halma to enhance its water analysis and water quality programs. Assisted by Dinsmore’s counsel, Halma continues to grow and expand its product offerings to clients and position itself as an industry leader.
Obtained Reversal and Summary Judgment on Multi-employer Pension Plan Amendments Act
Andrew Howe represented a manufacturing company against a large multi-employer pension fund regarding a dispute over whether pension contributions were owed to the fund for hours worked by temporary personnel workers. Counsel for the fund argued contributions were owed despite the fact these workers were not employees of the employer who was party to the collective bargaining agreement. Summary judgment was awarded on behalf of the fund, but on appeal Mr. Howe obtained a reversal and entry of summary judgment in favor of the employer in a case of first impression to the Third Circuit.
Rum Creek Coal Sales, Inc. v. Caperton, 926 F.2d 353 (4th Cir. 1991)
Assisted lead counsel in case against Governor where Fourth Circuit held state trespass statute unconstitutional and preempted. Also assisted in successful claim for attorney fees of $850,000.
BE&K Construction v. NLRB, 536 U.S. 516 (2002)
U.S. Supreme Court overruled circuit court holding that practice of the National Labor Relations Board of awarding attorney fees to all Unions who were not adjudicated liable in civil actions brought by Employers was a violation of the Employer's First Amendment right to petition. Filed amicus curiae brief in aid of Employer's successful claim on behalf of the Labor Policy Association.
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated v. Teamsters Local 991, 210 Fed. Appx. 873, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 30758 (11th Cir. 2006)
Court overruled district court order granting judgment to Union enforcing arbitration award. Court held an arbitration award granting "make whole" ruling without quantifying the award was ambiguous and vacation of the award was appropriate.
IBEW, Local 1547 v. NLRB, 50 Fed. Appx. 814, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 18206 (9th Cir. 2002)
Court affirmed order of the National Labor Relations Board holding that an Employer may maintain a by-law prohibiting family members of Union employees or representatives from qualifying for Board membership.
New Beckley Mining Corp. v. UMWA, 18 F.3d 1161 (4th Cir. 1994)
Court upheld dismissal of Union claims of RICO against Employer. Court also upheld dismissal of Employer's allegations of civil RICO violations arising out of strike violence.
Teamsters Local 372, et al. v. Detroit Newspapers Agency, 956 F.Supp. 753 (E.D. MI 1997)
Court declined to dismiss civil RICO action by Employer against striking Unions. Court held Employer would prevail on civil RICO allegations alleging strike violence involving attempted murder, arson and extortion.
Smart Answers to Complicated Questions
Running a telecommunications company responsible for everything from tablets to cell towers means Bluegrass Cellular President and CEO Ron Smith often needs correct answers to complicated questions. And for 20 years, Dinsmore has been answering Smith’s questions on topics ranging from labor and employment to government regulations to OSHA.
“Certainly over the years we’ve had top-notch services from Dinsmore and have really enjoyed the relationship,” Smith said. “I don’t know how we could do our business without them.”
Bluegrass’ services include mobile devices and accessories, talk and text plans, data plans, mobile apps, wireless Internet, and mobile Internet. Staying in business means keeping up with ever-changing government standards that affect everything from human resource issues to cell tower placement and function.
Smith said Dinsmore helps navigate these and other issues by explaining all sides of the matter and then detailing the logic of their counsel. Dinsmore’s attorneys never provide Smith an answer without an adequate explanation.
“It’s more about our education and our being able to make a good business decision,” Smith said.
Smith also appreciates that Dinsmore has multiple attorneys working to ensure the success of his business.
“You develop a really good comfort that you’re not dealing with just one individual, but you’re dealing with a firm that’s pretty deep,” Smith said.
Rose v. Beverly Health & Rehab. Services (C.D. Calif.)
Lewis v. Ashland Inc. (D. Minn.)
Represented Coal Company in Acquisition of Mines
Dinsmore, led by Tom Rubenstein and Jason Sims, represented Coronado in a $420 million transaction that included 14 other attorneys from various practice groups within the firm. In the transaction, Coronado acquired the Buchanan Mine Complex in Southwest Virginia along with the idled Amonate Complex and additional undeveloped metallurgical coal reserves in Southwest Virginia and Pennsylvania from CONSOL Energy, Inc.
Dinsmore acted as lead counsel in the transaction and was responsible for nearly all legal issues concerning the transaction, including advising the client on environmental, tax, labor and employment, employee benefits and real estate issues.
This particular coal transaction involved complex issues because CONSOL Energy retained rights to the natural gas on these properties, which required Dinsmore to assist Coronado in the negotiation of cooperation agreements related to the properties and advising Coronado on the proper structure for the transaction based on the continuing relationship that will exist between Coronado and CONSOL Energy after the consummation of the transaction.
Coronado significantly increased its capacity with this acquisition and now has an enhanced position in the markets it serves with a greater ability to serve its customers and increase its overall sales.
Enforcement of Non-Compete Agreements Against Former Employees
Representation of International Malt Beverage Manufacturer
Allegations of age discrimination against an international media company
Prior to trial, we successfully moved the court to dismiss plaintiff’s intentional infliction of emotional distress claim, arguing that pursuant to Kentucky law the claim was precluded by his age discrimination claim. We also successfully limited the evidence plaintiff sought to use at trial, including evidence of the company’s overall financial state as described in public filings.
During the eight-day trial in Jefferson Circuit Court, we established the company’s non-discriminatory reason for plaintiff’s termination: his highly paid job position was eliminated for business reasons due to a corporate restructuring. The jury of seven men and five women determined that age was not a “substantial motivating factor” in terminating the executive or in refusing to offer him another job position, finding for the defendant on both counts of age discrimination. The plaintiff did not appeal the jury’s verdict and the case is now final.
Captive Audience Legislation in West Virginia (2010)
Testified on behalf of West Virginia Chamber of Commerce regarding Captive Audience Legislation in West Virginia and appeared on television program "Decision Makers" to debate issue against UMWA official and Delegate who proposed bill.
Eagle Creek Mining, LLC - 9-RC-18325 (2010)
Represented company in R-hearing over under-inclusive unit issues, including filing request for review to NLRB. Provided legal advice during campaign on NLRA 8(c) communications. Union withdrew petition on eve of election.
Representation of Energy Industry Companies (2010)
Multi-National Package Delivery Business (DHL Express), 9-CB-11361
Represented in unfair labor practice charges against Teamster, Local 505 in violent strike situation.
Multi-State Utility Company
Represented company in West Virginia employment law cases, unfair labor practice charges and grievance arbitration hearings.
District 17, UMWA v. Marrowbone Development Company, 232 F.3d 383 (4th Cir. 2000)
Defended company in union's effort to overturn arbitration decision. Case eventually remanded to arbitrator in order to take additional evidence.
Flexsys America, L.P. v. Local Union 12610, 88 F.Supp.2d 600 (S.D. W.Va. 2000)
After hearing, arbitrator held ex parte conversation with employer advocate requesting company re-open hearing to investigate whether discharged employee's supervisor was "gay" which would influence arbitrator's decision. Obtained judgment to set aside arbitrator's decision due to discriminatory bias.
Superior Pocahontas Coal Company v. Island Creek Coal Company, 840 F.2d 11 (4th Cir. 1988)
Defended company in claim for pension plan withdrawal liability claim incurred by other company when it ceased operations, where adhesion contract claimed.
Secretary of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) v. Mid-America Mining
The U.S. issued a Section 105(c) citation to this Arkansas mining company, claiming that it fired its general manager after he has made formal complaints about the safety of the mine and its practices. This matter was settled on favorable terms to the client.
9-RC-17844 - Rockspring Development, 353 NLRB No. 105 (2004-2009)
UMWA election where initial tally of ballots was 110 for and 103 against union representation with 9 outcome determinative challenged ballots in 2004. Represented clients in hearings on challenge ballots and appeals, including challenges on supervisory and managerial status of challenged voters. Ultimately, all ballots were opened with final election results in 2009 of 110 for and 112 against union representation.
27-CA-20837 – Foundation Coal West, Inc. (2008)
Successfully represented company in subsequent case regarding failure to promote union organizer and settled new allegations regarding additional distribution of literature issues.
6-RC-12619 – Simonton Windows (2008)
Represented employer in R proceedings on unit under-inclusive issues and succeeded in having union withdraw its petition. Also provided labor law training to supervisors.
9-CA-44064 – Magnum Coal Company and Apogee Coal Company (2008)
Successfully defended company in unilateral change charge on implementing drug testing program after company's discussions with union and it's clean unmistakable waiver.
9-RC-18206 – Carmeuse Lime LLC, (2008)
Represented employer in R proceedings and gave legal advice on lawful Section 8(c) communications during election campaign. Union won election 76-71.
Foundation Coal West, Inc., 352 NLRB No. 22 - 27-CA-20202; 27-CA-20295 (2007-2008)
Represented company in NLRB solicitation and distribution cases incident to union organizing drive and issues surrounding distribution of literature in a mixed-use venue.
9-CA-43629 - Carmeuse Lime LLC, (2007)
Successfully defended company in discharge case involving alleged union organizer discharged for repeated safety violations.
Kingston Resources - 9-RC-18041; 9-RC-18044 (2004-2005)
Represented company in successive R petitions filed by union and then withdrawn before R-hearing could be held. Provided labor law training to supervisors.
- Page 1 of 5